• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Mar 18 – Mar 24
FIRST Intensive Course (March 18-24, 2019) - What it means to be a researcher
Call for Applications
Deadline for application by December 10, 2018 
Aug 1 – Aug 23
8th GESIS Summer School in Survey Methodology
Registration is open 
Aug 4 – Aug 17
International Politics Summer School 2019
Deadline — until 15 April/May; for scholarship — until 1 February 

TV Paul, Professor McGill University (Canada): RESTRAINING GREAT POWERS:SOFT BALANCING IN WORLD POLITICS

We are glad to invite you to the public lecture of Prof. TV Paul, McGill University and President of the International Studies Association 

TV Paul, Professor McGill University (Canada)

RESTRAINING GREAT POWERS: SOFT BALANCING IN WORLD POLITICS

October 12, 17:00, Faculty of World Economy and International Politics, Shabolovka 31b, Kabinet 503

 

The book examines a crucial element of state behavior -- the use of international institutions and economic instruments such as sanctions -- to constrain the power of dominant actors. Much of International Relations scholarship fails to capture the use of these non-military instruments for constraining superior power. Analysts have coined the concept ‘soft balancing’ to describe this phenomenon (Paul, 2005; Pape, 2005). The soft balancing debate has generated much literature in the past half a decade or so. However, it has been used exclusively in the context of responses by second-tier states toward U.S. power. The main objective of this book project is to expand and test soft balancing arguments to historical eras (such as the Concert of Europe, and interwar period) and the emerging power, China. I seek to explore: under what conditions do states resort to soft balancing (relying on economic and institutional instruments) as opposed to hard balancing (relying on formal military alliances and arms buildups)? When do they combine both? What are the differences and similarities between the 20th and 21st century cases of soft balancing--one under multipolarity, the other under near-unipolarity? When do soft balancing efforts elicit hostile reactions and when do they produce positive results? Finally, what are the implications of soft balancing for the rise of new great powers and the international order, especially conflict and cooperation in the 21st century’s globalized international system?